AL

Reform Party

Andres Lipstok

Voting bloc: 31 vote alike · 10. term

2
Terms served
1602
Policy votes
23.5%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 35%Against · 33%Abstained · 32%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

23.5%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 23.5
Present but silent % 23.5
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1602 − 1225) / 1602 = 23.5%

Registered 1602 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1602
For: 551 · Against: 674 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 249 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

39.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 39.9
Present but silent % 39.9
Party loyalty % 98.9
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2685) / 4466 = 39.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1470 · Against: 1215 · Abstain: 14 · Did not vote: 1579 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2003-11-12 86. parandus Against
2003-11-12 85. parandus Against
2003-11-12 84. parandus Against
2003-11-12 83. parandus Against
2003-11-12 82. parandus Against
2003-11-12 81. parandus Against
2003-11-12 80. parandus Against
2003-11-12 79. parandus Against
2003-11-12 78. parandus Against
2003-11-12 77. parandus Against
2003-11-12 76. parandus Against
2003-11-12 75. parandus Against
2003-11-12 74. parandus Against
2003-11-12 73. parandus Against
2003-11-12 72. parandus Against
2003-11-12 71. parandus Against
2003-11-12 70. parandus Against
2003-11-12 69. parandus Against
2003-11-12 68. parandus Against
2003-11-12 67. parandus Against
2003-11-12 66. parandus Against
2003-11-12 65. parandus Did not vote
2003-11-12 64. parandus Against
2003-11-12 62. parandus Against
2003-11-12 61. parandus Against
2003-11-12 60. parandus Did not vote
2003-11-12 59. parandus Against
2003-11-12 58. parandus Against
2003-11-12 57. parandus Against
2003-11-12 56. parandus Against
2003-11-12 55. parandus Against
2003-11-12 54. parandus Against
2003-11-12 53. parandus Against
2003-11-12 52. parandus Against
2003-11-12 51. parandus Against
2003-11-12 50. parandus Against
2003-11-12 49. parandus Against
2003-11-12 48. parandus Against
2003-11-12 47. parandus Against
2003-11-12 46. parandus Against
2003-11-12 45. parandus Against
2003-11-12 44. parandus Against
2003-11-12 43. parandus Against
2003-11-12 42. parandus Against
2003-11-12 41. parandus Against
2003-11-12 40. parandus Against
2003-11-12 39. parandus Against
2003-11-12 38. parandus Against
2003-11-12 37. parandus Against
2003-11-12 36. parandus Against