AL

Reform Party

Andres Lipstok

Voting bloc: 31 vote alike · 10. term

2
Terms served
1602
Policy votes
23.5%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 35%Against · 33%Abstained · 32%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

23.5%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 23.5
Present but silent % 23.5
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1602 − 1225) / 1602 = 23.5%

Registered 1602 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1602
For: 551 · Against: 674 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 249 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

39.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 39.9
Present but silent % 39.9
Party loyalty % 98.9
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2685) / 4466 = 39.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1470 · Against: 1215 · Abstain: 14 · Did not vote: 1579 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2003-06-04 122. parandus Against
2003-06-04 121. parandus Against
2003-06-04 120. parandus Against
2003-06-04 119. parandus Against
2003-06-04 118. parandus Against
2003-06-04 117. parandus Against
2003-06-04 116. parandus Against
2003-06-04 115. parandus Against
2003-06-04 113. parandus Against
2003-06-04 112. parandus Against
2003-06-04 111. parandus Against
2003-06-04 110. parandus Against
2003-06-04 108. parandus Against
2003-06-04 107. parandus Against
2003-06-04 106. parandus Against
2003-06-04 105. parandus Against
2003-06-04 104. parandus Against
2003-06-04 103. parandus Against
2003-06-04 102. parandus Against
2003-06-04 101. parandus Against
2003-06-04 100. parandus Against
2003-06-04 99. parandus Against
2003-06-04 98. parandus Against
2003-06-04 97. parandus Against
2003-06-04 96. parandus Against
2003-06-04 95. parandus Against
2003-06-04 94. parandus Against
2003-06-04 92. parandus Against
2003-06-04 90. parandus Against
2003-06-04 89. parandus Against
2003-06-04 88. parandus Against
2003-06-04 87. parandus Against
2003-06-04 86. parandus Against
2003-06-04 85. parandus Against
2003-06-04 84. parandus Against
2003-06-04 83. parandus Against
2003-06-04 82. parandus Against
2003-06-04 81. parandus Against
2003-06-04 80. parandus Against
2003-06-04 79. parandus Against
2003-06-04 78. parandus Against
2003-06-04 77. parandus Against
2003-06-04 76. parandus Against
2003-06-04 75. parandus Against
2003-06-04 74. parandus Against
2003-06-04 73. parandus Against
2003-06-04 72. parandus Against
2003-06-04 71. parandus Against
2003-06-04 70. parandus Against
2003-06-04 69. parandus Against