Estonia ETEN
AL

Reform Party

Andres Lipstok

Voting bloc: 31 vote alike · 10. term

2
Terms served
1602
Policy votes
23.5%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 35%Against · 33%Abstained · 32%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
23.5%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 23.5
Present but silent % 23.5
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1602 − 1225) / 1602 = 23.5%

Registered 1602 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1602
For: 551 · Against: 674 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 249 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
39.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 39.9
Present but silent % 39.9
Party loyalty % 98.9
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2685) / 4466 = 39.9%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1470 · Against: 1215 · Abstain: 14 · Did not vote: 1579 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Parties

termParties
10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

DateVote motionResult
13.11.2002 4. parandus Did not vote
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
13.11.2002 3. parandus Did not vote
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
13.11.2002 Arutelu katkestamine Did not vote
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
13.11.2002 10. parandus Did not vote
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
13.11.2002 4. parandus Against
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
13.11.2002 18. parandus Against
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
13.11.2002 1. parandus Did not vote
13.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
13.11.2002 12. parandus Against
13.11.2002 9. parandus Against
13.11.2002 7. parandus Against
13.11.2002 6. parandus Against
13.11.2002 5. parandus Against
13.11.2002 3. parandus For
13.11.2002 2. parandus For
13.11.2002 1. parandus Against
12.11.2002 13. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 12. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 11. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 10. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 9. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 8. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 7. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 5. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 4. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 2. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 1. parandus Did not vote
12.11.2002 Tiit Toomsalu ettepanek, tuua tänases päevakorras tema algatatud eelnõu 1155 päevakorra punktist nr Against
12.11.2002 Enn Tarto ja Mõõdukate fraktsiooni ettepanek, viia tänases päevakorras punkt 11, seaduseelnõu 1169, Abstained
11.11.2002 Päevakorra kinnitamine Did not vote
11.11.2002 Eelnõu päevakorrast välja Did not vote
11.11.2002 Tähtaja pikendamine 1024 SE Did not vote
11.11.2002 Tähtaja pikendamine 1009 SE Did not vote
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
06.11.2002 Lugemist mitte lõpetada Against
06.11.2002 Lõpphääletus For
05.11.2002 Lugemise lõpetamine Did not vote
05.11.2002 6. parandus For