Estonia ETEN
AT

Reform Party

Andres Taimla

Voting bloc: 28 vote alike · 10. term

2
Terms served
2557
Policy votes
22.2%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 40%Against · 33%Abstained · 27%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
22.2%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 22.2
Present but silent % 22.2
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 1990) / 2557 = 22.2%

Registered 2557 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2557
For: 1067 · Against: 923 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 312 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
35.3%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 35.3
Present but silent % 35.3
Party loyalty % 99.1
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2888) / 4466 = 35.3%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1599 · Against: 1289 · Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 1465 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Parties

termParties
10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

DateVote motionResult
18.04.2002 Tähtaja pikendamine 928 SE For
17.04.2002 176. parandus Against
17.04.2002 175. parandus Against
17.04.2002 173. parandus Against
17.04.2002 172. parandus Against
17.04.2002 169. parandus Against
17.04.2002 168. parandus For
17.04.2002 167. parandus Against
17.04.2002 166. parandus For
17.04.2002 164. parandus Against
17.04.2002 160. parandus Against
17.04.2002 157. parandus Against
17.04.2002 156. parandus Against
17.04.2002 145. parandus Against
17.04.2002 142. parandus Against
17.04.2002 138. parandus For
17.04.2002 137. parandus Against
17.04.2002 135. parandus For
17.04.2002 134. parandus Against
17.04.2002 133. parandus Against
17.04.2002 129. parandus Against
17.04.2002 128. parandus Against
17.04.2002 120. parandus Against
17.04.2002 117. parandus Against
17.04.2002 116. parandus Against
17.04.2002 106. parandus Against
17.04.2002 100. parandus For
17.04.2002 99. parandus Against
17.04.2002 94. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 92. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 90. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 88. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 87. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 86. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 76. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 71. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 68. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 65. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 62. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 56. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 55. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 54. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 53. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 52. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 51. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 49. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 48. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 44. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 35. parandus Did not vote
17.04.2002 33. parandus Did not vote