EE

Centre Party

Eldar Efendijev

Voting bloc: 29 vote alike · 12. term

3
Terms served
1948
Policy votes
47.3%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 59%Against · 15%Abstained · 26%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

47.3%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 47.3
Present but silent % 47.3
Party loyalty % 99.5
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1027) / 1948 = 47.3%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 825 · Against: 202 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 545 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

28.3%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 28.3
Present but silent % 28.3
Party loyalty % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1482) / 2067 = 28.3%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 1266 · Against: 216 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 375 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

30.4%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 30.4
Present but silent % 30.4
Party loyalty % 98.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2553 − 1777) / 2553 = 30.4%

Registered 2553 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2553
For: 1303 · Against: 474 · Abstain: 12 · Did not vote: 538 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
11.02.2004 Lõpphääletus For
10.02.2004 Lükata tagasi Against
10.02.2004 Lükata tagasi Against
09.02.2004 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
29.01.2004 Arutelu katkestamine For
29.01.2004 10. parandus For
29.01.2004 9. parandus For
29.01.2004 2. parandus Did not vote
28.01.2004 Arutelu katkestamine For
28.01.2004 8. parandus For
28.01.2004 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
28.01.2004 Lõpphääletus For
28.01.2004 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
28.01.2004 Lõpphääletus For
26.01.2004 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
22.01.2004 Arutelu katkestamine Absent
22.01.2004 6. parandus Absent
22.01.2004 5. parandus Absent
22.01.2004 4. parandus Absent
22.01.2004 3. parandus Absent
22.01.2004 2. parandus Absent
22.01.2004 1. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 3. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 1. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 Arutelu katkestamine Absent
21.01.2004 21. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 19. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 5. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 Lõpphääletus Absent
21.01.2004 Lõpphääletus Absent
21.01.2004 20. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 19. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 4. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 3. parandus Absent
21.01.2004 Lõpphääletus Absent
19.01.2004 Päevakorra kinnitamine Absent
15.01.2004 2. parandus For
14.01.2004 Lõpphääletus For
13.01.2004 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
13.01.2004 Lükata tagasi Against
13.01.2004 Lõpphääletus For
12.01.2004 Päevakorra kinnitamine&# Istungi rakendamine For
18.12.2003 *&#* Against
18.12.2003 Lõpphääletus For
17.12.2003 Arutelu katkestamine Against
17.12.2003 27. parandus For
17.12.2003 14. parandus Did not vote
17.12.2003 13. parandus Against
17.12.2003 4. parandus Did not vote
17.12.2003 1. parandus For