EE

Centre Party

Eldar Efendijev

Voting bloc: 29 vote alike · 12. term

3
Terms served
1948
Policy votes
47.3%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 59%Against · 15%Abstained · 26%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

47.3%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 47.3
Present but silent % 47.3
Party loyalty % 99.5
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1027) / 1948 = 47.3%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 825 · Against: 202 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 545 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

28.3%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 28.3
Present but silent % 28.3
Party loyalty % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1482) / 2067 = 28.3%

Registered 2067 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2067
For: 1266 · Against: 216 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 375 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

30.4%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 30.4
Present but silent % 30.4
Party loyalty % 98.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2553 − 1777) / 2553 = 30.4%

Registered 2553 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2553
For: 1303 · Against: 474 · Abstain: 12 · Did not vote: 538 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
21.10.2010 3. parandus Absent
21.10.2010 Lõpphääletus Absent
21.10.2010 Lõpphääletus Absent
21.10.2010 Lõpphääletus Absent
20.10.2010 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
20.10.2010 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
20.10.2010 Lõpphääletus For
20.10.2010 Lõpphääletus For
20.10.2010 Lõpphääletus For
19.10.2010 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
19.10.2010 Arutelu katkestamine For
19.10.2010 27. parandus For
19.10.2010 23. parandus Against
19.10.2010 12. parandus For
19.10.2010 11. parandus Against
19.10.2010 1. parandus Did not vote
18.10.2010 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
14.10.2010 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
14.10.2010 5. parandus For
14.10.2010 4. parandus For
14.10.2010 3. parandus For
13.10.2010 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
12.10.2010 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
12.10.2010 Lükata tagasi Against
12.10.2010 Lõpphääletus Against
11.10.2010 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
30.09.2010 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
30.09.2010 Lõpphääletus For
29.09.2010 Lükata tagasi Absent
29.09.2010 Lõpphääletus Absent
29.09.2010 Lükata tagasi Did not vote
27.09.2010 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
23.09.2010 Lõpphääletus Against
22.09.2010 Arutelu katkestamine Against
22.09.2010 Arutelu katkestamine For
22.09.2010 1. parandus For
22.09.2010 Ettepaneku hääletus For
20.09.2010 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
16.09.2010 Lõpphääletus Against
15.09.2010 Arutelu katkestamine For
15.09.2010 87. parandus For
15.09.2010 80. parandus Against
15.09.2010 68. parandus For
15.09.2010 65. parandus For
15.09.2010 63. parandus For
15.09.2010 58. parandus For
15.09.2010 34. parandus For
15.09.2010 30. parandus Against
15.09.2010 29. parandus Against
15.09.2010 22. parandus For