Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2063 − 1886) / 2063 = 8.6%
Registered 2063 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2063
For: 997 · Against: 889 ·
Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 159 ·
Absent: 0
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Terje Trei 100% agreement
- Ülle Rajasalu 100% agreement
- Tõnu Juul 100% agreement
- Robert Antropov 100% agreement
- Rein Aidma 100% agreement
- Hanno Pevkur 100% agreement
- Maret Maripuu 100% agreement
- Mati Raidma 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Ivari Padar 14% agreement
- Evelyn Sepp 31% agreement
- Heimar Lenk 34% agreement
- Mai Treial 35% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 35% agreement
- Eldar Efendijev 35% agreement
- Mailis Reps 37% agreement
- Aadu Must 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 11. term | — Non-attached |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 15.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 15.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 14.05.2007 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 10.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 10.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 10.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 08.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 08.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 08.05.2007 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 07.05.2007 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 30.04.2007 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 12.04.2007 | Lõpphääletus | Absent |