Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3144 − 2160) / 3144 = 31.3%
Registered 3144 · Absent 0
· Votes available 3144
For: 1316 · Against: 844 ·
Abstain: 16 · Did not vote: 820 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Peeter Olesk 100% agreement
- Mart Nutt 100% agreement
- Kadri Jäätma 100% agreement
- Trivimi Velliste 99% agreement
- Jaan Leppik 99% agreement
- Jüri Kaver 99% agreement
- Andres Herkel 99% agreement
- Kalle Jürgenson 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Olev Raju 36% agreement
- Mai Treial 37% agreement
- Jaanus Männik 38% agreement
- Tõnu Kauba 41% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 41% agreement
- Küllo Arjakas 41% agreement
- Vahur Glaase 42% agreement
- Urmas Laht 42% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 9. term | Isamaaliidu fraktsioon Isamaaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-11-15 | 243. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 242. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 241. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 240. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 239. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 238. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 234. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 233. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 232. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 229. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 227. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 224. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 223. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 221. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 220. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 219. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 218. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 210. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 209. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 208. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 206. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 205. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 204. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 201. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 192. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 190. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 189. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 181. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 174. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 169. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 163. parandus | For |
| 2000-11-15 | 154. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 153. parandus | For |
| 2000-11-15 | 152. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 151. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 150. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 149. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 148. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 141. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 140. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 133. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 132. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 130. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 129. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 128. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 127. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 126. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 125. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 123. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 122. parandus | Against |