Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3144 − 1715) / 3144 = 45.5%
Registered 2644 · Absent 500
· Votes available 3144
For: 988 · Against: 727 ·
Abstain: 12 · Did not vote: 744 ·
Absent: 500
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Peeter Olesk 100% agreement
- Mart Nutt 99% agreement
- Kadri Jäätma 99% agreement
- Ingvar Pärnamäe 99% agreement
- Aimar Altosaar 99% agreement
- Jaan Leppik 99% agreement
- Kalle Jürgenson 99% agreement
- Andres Herkel 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Olev Raju 31% agreement
- Mai Treial 31% agreement
- Tõnu Kauba 34% agreement
- Jaanus Männik 35% agreement
- Urmas Laht 36% agreement
- Küllo Arjakas 37% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 37% agreement
- Anti Liiv 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 9. term | Isamaaliidu fraktsioon Isamaaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2000-11-15 | 121. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 120. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 119. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 118. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 116. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 115. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 113. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 107. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 104. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 103. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 101. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 100. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 99. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 96. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 92. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 88. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 87. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 76. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 74. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 73. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 72. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 70. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 59. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 54. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 53. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 52. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 51. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 50. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 49. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 48. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 47. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2000-11-15 | 46. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2000-11-15 | 45. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 44. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 43. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 42. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 41. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 40. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 39. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 38. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2000-11-15 | 37. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 36. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 35. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 34. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 33. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 32. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 31. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 30. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 29. parandus | Against |
| 2000-11-15 | 28. parandus | Against |