Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (440 − 342) / 440 = 22.3%
Registered 440 · Absent 0
· Votes available 440
For: 236 · Against: 106 ·
Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 93 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2779) / 4466 = 37.8%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 1601 · Against: 1178 ·
Abstain: 21 · Did not vote: 1110 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Kristiina Ojuland 100% agreement
- Margus Hanson 99% agreement
- Mait Klaassen 99% agreement
- Harri Õunapuu 99% agreement
- Sergei Ivanov 98% agreement
- Rain Rosimannus 98% agreement
- Jaanus Tamkivi 98% agreement
- Rein Aidma 98% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Kadi Pärnits 41% agreement
- Jarno Laur 43% agreement
- Eiki Nestor 49% agreement
- Juhan Parts 49% agreement
- Indrek Raudne 49% agreement
- Helir-Valdor Seeder 50% agreement
- Ken-Marti Vaher 52% agreement
- Mark Soosaar 52% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 10. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
| 9. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2003-01-30 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-30 | 7. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-30 | Lõpphääletus | Did not vote |
| 2003-01-30 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-30 | Lõpphääletus&# 1304 OE | Absent |
| 2003-01-30 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-30 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | Did not vote |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | Did not vote |
| 2003-01-29 | 21. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2003-01-29 | 14. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2003-01-29 | 13. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | 31. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 30. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 28. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 24. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 23. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 22. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 21. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 10. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | 8. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | 4. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 3. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 24. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 22. parandus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 3. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 4. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 2003-01-29 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-01-29 | 5. parandus | Against |