Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2297) / 4466 = 48.6%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 1443 · Against: 854 ·
Abstain: 23 · Did not vote: 1881 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Mart Laar 100% agreement
- Peeter Olesk 100% agreement
- Andres Herkel 99% agreement
- Tunne-Väldo Kelam 99% agreement
- Mari-Ann Kelam 99% agreement
- Tõnis Lukas 99% agreement
- Trivimi Velliste 99% agreement
- Jüri Kaver 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Evelyn Sepp 24% agreement
- Indrek Meelak 28% agreement
- Tõnu Kauba 29% agreement
- Olev Raju 29% agreement
- Jaak Aab 30% agreement
- Küllo Arjakas 31% agreement
- Nelli Privalova 32% agreement
- Ando Leps 32% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 9. term | Isamaaliidu fraktsioon Isamaaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16.11.2000 | 11. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 1. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | Läbirääkimiste lõpetamine | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 462 SE | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 5. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 2. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | Läbirääkimiste lõpetamine | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 288. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 287. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 286. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 285. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 284. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 266. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 265. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 264. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 263. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 257. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 255. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 250. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 248. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 247. parandus | Against |
| 16.11.2000 | 244. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 243. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 242. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 241. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 240. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 239. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 238. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 234. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 233. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 232. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 229. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 227. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 224. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 223. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 221. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 220. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 219. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 218. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 210. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 209. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 208. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 206. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 205. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 204. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 201. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 192. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 190. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 189. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 181. parandus | Against |