Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1100 − 622) / 1100 = 43.5%
Registered 1099 · Absent 1
· Votes available 1100
For: 365 · Against: 257 ·
Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 238 ·
Absent: 1
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1858 − 1182) / 1858 = 36.4%
Registered 1801 · Absent 57
· Votes available 1858
For: 751 · Against: 431 ·
Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 316 ·
Absent: 57
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Rene Kokk 100% agreement
- Siim Pohlak 100% agreement
- Anti Poolamets 100% agreement
- Varro Vooglaid 100% agreement
- Martin Helme 99% agreement
- Helle-Moonika Helme 99% agreement
- Ants Frosch 99% agreement
- Arvo Aller 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 8% agreement
- Jürgen Ligi 10% agreement
- Yoko Alender 11% agreement
- Pärtel-Peeter Pere 11% agreement
- Siim Kallas 12% agreement
- Ants Laaneots 12% agreement
- Mati Raidma 14% agreement
- Erkki Keldo 14% agreement