KP

Centre Party

Koit Pikaro

Voting bloc: 29 vote alike · 10. term

2
Terms served
1023
Policy votes
9.7%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 50%Against · 25%Abstained · 26%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

9.7%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 9.7
Present but silent % 9.7
Party loyalty % 99.5
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1023 − 924) / 1023 = 9.7%

Registered 1023 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1023
For: 554 · Against: 370 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 65 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

36.2%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 36.2
Present but silent % 36.2
Party loyalty % 97.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2850) / 4466 = 36.2%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1958 · Against: 892 · Abstain: 38 · Did not vote: 1192 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Parties

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2002-05-22 68. parandus Against
2002-05-22 67. parandus Against
2002-05-22 66. parandus Against
2002-05-22 65. parandus Against
2002-05-22 64. parandus Against
2002-05-22 63. parandus Against
2002-05-22 62. parandus Against
2002-05-22 61. parandus Against
2002-05-22 60. parandus Against
2002-05-22 59. parandus Against
2002-05-22 58. parandus Against
2002-05-22 57. parandus Against
2002-05-22 56. parandus Against
2002-05-22 55. parandus Did not vote
2002-05-22 54. parandus Against
2002-05-22 53. parandus Against
2002-05-22 52. parandus Against
2002-05-22 50. parandus Against
2002-05-22 49. parandus Against
2002-05-22 48. parandus Against
2002-05-22 47. parandus Against
2002-05-22 46. parandus Against
2002-05-22 45. parandus Against
2002-05-22 44. parandus Against
2002-05-22 43. parandus Against
2002-05-22 42. parandus Against
2002-05-22 41. parandus Against
2002-05-22 40. parandus Against
2002-05-22 39. parandus Against
2002-05-22 38. parandus Against
2002-05-22 37. parandus Against
2002-05-22 36. parandus Against
2002-05-22 35. parandus Against
2002-05-22 34. parandus Against
2002-05-22 33. parandus Against
2002-05-22 32. parandus Against
2002-05-22 31. parandus Against
2002-05-22 30. parandus Against
2002-05-22 28. parandus Against
2002-05-22 27. parandus Against
2002-05-22 26. parandus Against
2002-05-22 25. parandus Against
2002-05-22 24. parandus Against
2002-05-22 23. parandus Against
2002-05-22 22. parandus Against
2002-05-22 21. parandus Against
2002-05-22 19. parandus Against
2002-05-22 18. parandus Against
2002-05-22 17. parandus Against
2002-05-22 16. parandus Against