Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1709 − 641) / 1709 = 62.5%
Registered 1708 · Absent 1
· Votes available 1709
For: 316 · Against: 325 ·
Abstain: 13 · Did not vote: 610 ·
Absent: 1
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3 − 3) / 3 = 0.0%
Registered 3 · Absent 0
· Votes available 3
For: 0 · Against: 3 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Kert Kingo 99% agreement
- Siim Pohlak 99% agreement
- Varro Vooglaid 99% agreement
- Anti Poolamets 98% agreement
- Martin Helme 98% agreement
- Mart Helme 97% agreement
- Rene Kokk 97% agreement
- Evelin Poolamets 97% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Pärtel-Peeter Pere 8% agreement
- Priit Lomp 9% agreement
- Ants Laaneots 9% agreement
- Jürgen Ligi 10% agreement
- Liisa-Ly Pakosta 10% agreement
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 10% agreement
- Karmen Joller 11% agreement
- Erkki Keldo 12% agreement
Parties
Votes
Born: 1977-06-06. Official's declaration (VID) ↗