Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1855 − 1356) / 1855 = 26.9%
Registered 1855 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1855
For: 878 · Against: 478 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 312 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Uno Kaskpeit 100% agreement
- Peeter Ernits 99% agreement
- Kai Rimmel 99% agreement
- Henn Põlluaas 99% agreement
- Alar Laneman 99% agreement
- Urmas Espenberg 99% agreement
- Leo Kunnas 99% agreement
- Kalev Kallo 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 37% agreement
- Tiiu Aro 37% agreement
- Eerik-Niiles Kross 38% agreement
- Aivar Viidik 38% agreement
- Ülle Rajasalu 38% agreement
- Toomas Järveoja 39% agreement
- Sulev Kannimäe 39% agreement
- Mati Raidma 39% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 14. term | Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon EKRE |