Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1855 − 1276) / 1855 = 31.2%
Registered 1855 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1855
For: 812 · Against: 464 ·
Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 320 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Rein Suurkask 100% agreement
- Kai Rimmel 100% agreement
- Leo Kunnas 99% agreement
- Jaak Valge 99% agreement
- Anti Poolamets 99% agreement
- Rene Kokk 99% agreement
- Siim Pohlak 99% agreement
- Helle-Moonika Helme 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Tiiu Aro 33% agreement
- Aivar Viidik 35% agreement
- Sulev Kannimäe 35% agreement
- Mati Raidma 35% agreement
- Toomas Järveoja 36% agreement
- Ülle Rajasalu 36% agreement
- Timo Suslov 36% agreement
- Eerik-Niiles Kross 36% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 14. term | Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon EKRE |