Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2064) / 4466 = 53.8%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 1312 · Against: 752 ·
Abstain: 7 · Did not vote: 1634 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Kristiina Ojuland 98% agreement
- Peeter Olesk 97% agreement
- Ingvar Pärnamäe 96% agreement
- Ivar Tallo 96% agreement
- Vardo Rumessen 96% agreement
- Jüri Kaver 96% agreement
- Meelis Paavel 95% agreement
- Rein Järvelill 95% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Mai Treial 45% agreement
- Liina Tõnisson 48% agreement
- Jaanus Marrandi 50% agreement
- Siiri Oviir 50% agreement
- Edgar Savisaar 50% agreement
- Jaanus Männik 50% agreement
- Andres Varik 51% agreement
- Viktor Andrejev 52% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 9. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party Switched party: Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon → Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15.11.2000 | 174. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 169. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 163. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 154. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 153. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 152. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 151. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 150. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 149. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 148. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 141. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 140. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 133. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 132. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 130. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 129. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 128. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 127. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 126. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 125. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 123. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 122. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 121. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 120. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 119. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 118. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 116. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 115. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 113. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 107. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 104. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 103. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 101. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 100. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 99. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 96. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 92. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 88. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 87. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 76. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 74. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 73. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 72. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 70. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 59. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 54. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 53. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 52. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 51. parandus | Against |
| 15.11.2000 | 50. parandus | Against |