Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2762) / 4466 = 38.2%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 1759 · Against: 1003 ·
Abstain: 48 · Did not vote: 1402 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Peeter Olesk 100% agreement
- Lauri Vahtre 99% agreement
- Trivimi Velliste 99% agreement
- Ivar Tallo 99% agreement
- Andres Herkel 99% agreement
- Mart Nutt 99% agreement
- Jaan Leppik 99% agreement
- Tõnis Lukas 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Aap Neljas 31% agreement
- Evelyn Sepp 34% agreement
- Tõnu Kauba 34% agreement
- Olev Raju 35% agreement
- Küllo Arjakas 37% agreement
- Urmas Laht 38% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 38% agreement
- Indrek Meelak 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 9. term | Isamaaliidu fraktsioon Isamaaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2002-11-20 | Lõpphääletus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | Arutelu katkestamine | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 5. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | Lõpphääletus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 1. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 2. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | Arutelu katkestamine | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 81. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 80. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 79. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 78. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 77. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 76. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 75. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 74. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 73. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 72. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 71. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 70. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 69. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 68. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 67. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 66. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 65. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 64. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 63. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 62. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 61. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 60. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 59. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 57. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 56. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 55. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 54. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 53. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 52. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 51. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 50. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 49. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 48. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 47. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 46. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2002-11-20 | 45. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 44. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 43. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 42. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 41. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 40. parandus | For |
| 2002-11-20 | 39. parandus | For |