Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1851 − 1325) / 1851 = 28.4%
Registered 1694 · Absent 157
· Votes available 1851
For: 791 · Against: 534 ·
Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 251 ·
Absent: 157
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Urmas Reinsalu 100% agreement
- Rein Suurkask 100% agreement
- Kalev Kallo 100% agreement
- Raivo Tamm 100% agreement
- Priit Sibul 100% agreement
- Mihhail Lotman 99% agreement
- Tarmo Kruusimäe 99% agreement
- Aivar Kokk 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 36% agreement
- Aivar Viidik 37% agreement
- Tiiu Aro 38% agreement
- Keit Pentus-Rosimannus 40% agreement
- Katri Raik 44% agreement
- Hanno Pevkur 44% agreement
- Taavi Rõivas 47% agreement
- Annely Akkermann 50% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 14. term | Isamaa fraktsioon Isamaa Switched party: Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed → Isamaa fraktsioon |