Isamaa fraktsioon
18
Deputies
98%
Cohesion
31.8%
Inactivity %
99.5%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 48%Against · 27%Abstained · 26%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urmas Reinsalu | 947 |
71.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.2%
|
| 2 | Viktoria Ladõnskaja-Kubits | 1855 |
49.7%
|
100.0%
|
93.5%
|
| 3 | Mihhail Lotman | 1855 |
44.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.4%
|
| 4 | Jüri Luik | 161 |
43.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 5 | Sven Sester | 1855 |
43.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 6 | Aivar Kokk | 1858 |
38.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 7 | Helir-Valdor Seeder | 1858 |
37.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 8 | Siim Kiisler | 890 |
33.5%
|
100.0%
|
97.4%
|
| 9 | Andres Metsoja | 1858 |
32.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 10 | Tarmo Kruusimäe | 1855 |
32.0%
|
100.0%
|
94.9%
|
| 11 | Raivo Tamm | 1855 |
31.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 12 | Üllar Saaremäe | 1855 |
29.7%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 13 | Priit Sibul | 1858 |
28.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 14 | Mart Nutt | 21 |
28.6%
|
100.0%
|
92.9%
|
| 15 | Heiki Hepner | 1694 |
28.4%
|
91.5%
|
99.2%
|
| 16 | Riina Solman | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 17 | Tõnis Lukas | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 18 | Mart Maastik | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.