Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1501) / 2067 = 27.4%
Registered 2067 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2067
For: 814 · Against: 687 ·
Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 445 ·
Absent: 0
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 1309) / 2557 = 48.8%
Registered 2557 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2557
For: 699 · Against: 610 ·
Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 679 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Ülle Rajasalu 100% agreement
- Robert Antropov 100% agreement
- Terje Trei 100% agreement
- Mati Raidma 100% agreement
- Ene Kaups 100% agreement
- Rein Aidma 100% agreement
- Maret Maripuu 100% agreement
- Ivi Eenmaa 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Ivari Padar 17% agreement
- Evelyn Sepp 31% agreement
- Heimar Lenk 36% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 37% agreement
- Eldar Efendijev 37% agreement
- Aadu Must 38% agreement
- Mai Treial 38% agreement
- Mailis Reps 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 11. term | — Non-attached |
| 10. term | Res Publica fraktsioon Res Publica fraktsioon Switched party: Res Publica fraktsioon → Fraktsiooni mittekuuluvad Riigikogu liikmed |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-22 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-21 | 6. parandus | Against |
| 2010-04-21 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-21 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-21 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-21 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-21 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-21 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-20 | Tööaja pikendamine | For |
| 2010-04-20 | Lõpphääletus | Against |
| 2010-04-20 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-19 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 2010-04-15 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-14 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-14 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-13 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-13 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-13 | Tööaja pikendamine | For |
| 2010-04-13 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-13 | Lõpphääletus | Against |
| 2010-04-13 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-12 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 2010-04-07 | Lükata tagasi | Against |
| 2010-04-07 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-07 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-07 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-04-06 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-06 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-06 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-04-05 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 2010-03-25 | Nimekirja sulgemine&# Juhatuse valimine | For |
| 2010-03-25 | Nimekirja sulgemine&# Juhatuse valimine | For |
| 2010-03-24 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2010-03-24 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 2010-03-24 | Arutelu katkestamine | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 139. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 100. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 99. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 98. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 97. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 96. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 95. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 94. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 93. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 92. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 91. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 90. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 89. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 88. parandus | Against |
| 2010-03-24 | 87. parandus | Against |