Res Publica fraktsioon
38
Deputies
99%
Cohesion
36.5%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 43%Against · 33%Abstained · 24%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Juhan Parts | 1018 |
74.1%
|
100.0%
|
94.9%
|
| 2 | Ken-Marti Vaher | 1050 |
72.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 3 | Tiit Matsulevitš | 2553 |
63.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 4 | Marko Mihkelson | 2557 |
58.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 5 | Taavi Veskimägi | 1241 |
57.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.7%
|
| 6 | Eiki Berg | 956 |
51.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 7 | Ülo Vooglaid | 590 |
50.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 8 | Siiri Sisask | 2330 |
49.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 9 | Jaanus Rahumägi | 2557 |
48.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 10 | Mihhail Lotman | 1599 |
44.4%
|
100.0%
|
97.5%
|
| 11 | Reet Roos | 2557 |
41.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 12 | Olari Taal | 2557 |
40.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 13 | Imre Sooäär | 2557 |
40.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 14 | Indrek Raudne | 2557 |
39.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 15 | Tarmo Leinatamm | 2557 |
38.8%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 16 | Marko Pomerants | 1018 |
38.5%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 17 | Tiit Niilo | 2334 |
38.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 18 | Urmas Reinsalu | 2557 |
35.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.1%
|
| 19 | Ene Ergma | 2557 |
33.0%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 20 | Elle Kull | 2557 |
32.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 21 | Ants Pauls | 2557 |
31.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 22 | Ela Tomson | 2557 |
31.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 23 | Henn Pärn | 2427 |
31.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 24 | Hirvo Surva | 223 |
29.1%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 25 | Ago-Endrik Kerge | 514 |
28.6%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 26 | Olav Aarna | 2557 |
28.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 27 | Anti Tammeoks | 946 |
28.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 28 | Andres Kork | 1539 |
28.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 29 | Aivar Õun | 2327 |
26.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 30 | Andres Jalak | 2557 |
25.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 31 | Avo Üprus | 2557 |
24.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 32 | Sven Sester | 2557 |
22.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.5%
|
| 33 | Siim-Valmar Kiisler | 1669 |
22.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 34 | Hannes Võrno | 223 |
20.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 35 | Urmo Kööbi | 2557 |
18.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 36 | Tõnis Palts | 774 |
17.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 37 | Nelli Kalikova | 2557 |
16.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 38 | Külvar Mand | 230 |
6.1%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.