Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2247 − 1538) / 2247 = 31.6%
Registered 2247 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2247
For: 868 · Against: 670 ·
Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 301 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Hannes Võrno 100% agreement
- Mati Kepp 100% agreement
- Tiit Mae 100% agreement
- Arno Rossman 100% agreement
- Rein Randver 100% agreement
- Jüri Saar 99% agreement
- Margus Leivo 99% agreement
- Hirvo Surva 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Mart Laar 29% agreement
- Helir-Valdor Seeder 33% agreement
- Andres Tarand 33% agreement
- Kadi Pärnits 36% agreement
- Tunne-Väldo Kelam 37% agreement
- Tõnis Lukas 37% agreement
- Eiki Nestor 38% agreement
- Andres Herkel 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 10. term | Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2003-11-13 | 5. parandus | For |
| 2003-11-13 | 3. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-13 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-11-12 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-11-12 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 2003-11-12 | Arutelu katkestamine | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 128. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 127. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 126. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 125. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 124. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 123. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 122. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 121. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 120. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 119. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 118. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 117. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 116. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 115. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 114. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 113. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 112. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 111. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 110. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 109. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 108. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 107. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 106. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 105. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 104. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 103. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 102. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 101. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 100. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 99. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 98. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 97. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 96. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 95. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 94. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 93. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 92. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 91. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 90. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 89. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 88. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 87. parandus | Against |
| 2003-11-12 | 86. parandus | Against |