Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon

Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon 17 deputies

Deputies

99%

Cohesion

33.0%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

Bills initiated

Questions & requests

For · 43%Against · 33%Abstained · 24%

Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.

Deputies →

#	Deputy	Policy votes	Inactivity %	Attendance %	Party loyalty %
1	Janno Reiljan	2557	62.8%	100.0%	98.5%
2	Villu Reiljan	310	61.9%	100.0%	100.0%
3	Tiit Tammsaar	1872	51.6%	100.0%	98.9%
4	Jaak Allik	2557	43.3%	100.0%	96.8%
5	Mai Treial	2557	43.0%	100.0%	99.2%
6	Tiit Mae	1539	37.0%	100.0%	99.4%
7	Rein Randver	2254	32.0%	100.0%	99.7%
8	Koit Prants	2247	31.6%	100.0%	99.3%
9	Mati Kepp	2553	31.3%	100.0%	99.7%
10	Jüri Saar	2557	31.0%	100.0%	99.7%
11	Margi Ein	2557	29.7%	100.0%	99.4%
12	Margus Leivo	1018	29.0%	100.0%	99.2%
13	Vello Tafenau	2557	25.5%	100.0%	99.2%
14	Jaanus Männik	2557	22.3%	100.0%	99.1%
15	Mart Opmann	2557	18.7%	100.0%	99.3%
16	Arno Rossman	685	10.7%	100.0%	99.5%
17	Jaan Õunapuu	4	0.0%	100.0%	100.0%

How is this calculated?

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.