MH

Reform Party

Margus Hanson

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

2
Terms served
1948
Policy votes
21.8%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 49%Against · 39%Abstained · 11%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

21.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 21.8
Present but silent % 21.8
Party loyalty % 99.3
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1524) / 1948 = 21.8%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 795 · Against: 729 · Abstain: 7 · Did not vote: 219 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

25.1%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 25.1
Present but silent % 25.1
Party loyalty % 99.3
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1077 − 807) / 1077 = 25.1%

Registered 1077 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1077
For: 499 · Against: 308 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 67 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
17.11.2005 93. parandus Against
17.11.2005 92. parandus Against
17.11.2005 Tööaja pikendamine For
17.11.2005 91. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 90. parandus Against
17.11.2005 89. parandus Against
17.11.2005 88. parandus Against
17.11.2005 87. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 86. parandus Against
17.11.2005 85. parandus Against
17.11.2005 84. parandus Against
17.11.2005 83. parandus Against
17.11.2005 82. parandus Against
17.11.2005 81. parandus Against
17.11.2005 80. parandus Against
17.11.2005 79. parandus Against
17.11.2005 78. parandus Against
17.11.2005 77. parandus Against
17.11.2005 76. parandus Against
17.11.2005 75. parandus Against
17.11.2005 74. parandus Against
17.11.2005 73. parandus Against
17.11.2005 72. parandus Against
17.11.2005 71. parandus Against
17.11.2005 70. parandus Against
17.11.2005 69. parandus Against
17.11.2005 68. parandus Against
17.11.2005 67. parandus Against
17.11.2005 66. parandus Against
17.11.2005 65. parandus Against
17.11.2005 64. parandus Against
17.11.2005 63. parandus Against
17.11.2005 62. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 61. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 60. parandus Against
17.11.2005 59. parandus Against
17.11.2005 58. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 57. parandus Against
17.11.2005 56. parandus Against
17.11.2005 55. parandus Against
17.11.2005 54. parandus Against
17.11.2005 53. parandus Against
17.11.2005 52. parandus Against
17.11.2005 51. parandus Against
17.11.2005 50. parandus Against
17.11.2005 49. parandus Against
17.11.2005 48. parandus Against
17.11.2005 47. parandus Against
17.11.2005 46. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 45. parandus Did not vote