Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon
44
Deputies
99%
Cohesion
20.5%
Inactivity %
99.9%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 46%Against · 40%Abstained · 14%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tarmo Leinatamm | 1723 |
74.4%
|
100.0%
|
96.9%
|
| 2 | Jürgen Ligi | 212 |
43.9%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 3 | Imre Sooäär | 1945 |
40.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 4 | Tiina Lokk-Tramberg | 1210 |
37.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 5 | Igor Gräzin | 1948 |
35.9%
|
100.0%
|
97.5%
|
| 6 | Kaja Kallas | 1354 |
32.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 7 | Andrus Ansip | 100 |
32.0%
|
100.0%
|
98.3%
|
| 8 | Raivo Järvi | 398 |
31.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.1%
|
| 9 | Taavi Rõivas | 738 |
29.5%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 10 | Tõnu Juul | 1736 |
28.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 11 | Kalle Palling | 1948 |
22.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 12 | Terje Trei | 1135 |
22.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 13 | Margus Hanson | 1948 |
21.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 14 | Tõnis Kõiv | 1948 |
21.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 15 | Maret Maripuu | 1426 |
21.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 16 | Rein Lang | 565 |
21.1%
|
100.0%
|
97.3%
|
| 17 | Valdo Randpere | 1948 |
20.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 18 | Arto Aas | 1948 |
19.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 19 | Laine Randjärv | 1948 |
19.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 20 | Kalev Kallemets | 315 |
18.7%
|
100.0%
|
95.6%
|
| 21 | Remo Holsmer | 1948 |
17.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 22 | Andrei Korobeinik | 1383 |
17.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 23 | Andre Sepp | 1848 |
17.1%
|
95.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 24 | Innar Mäesalu | 225 |
16.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.4%
|
| 25 | Mati Raidma | 1765 |
16.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 26 | Väino Linde | 1948 |
16.1%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 27 | Jaanus Tamkivi | 1948 |
15.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 28 | Aivar Sõerd | 1948 |
15.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 29 | Lauri Luik | 1948 |
15.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 30 | Rait Maruste | 1948 |
15.0%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 31 | Paul-Erik Rummo | 1945 |
14.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 32 | Urve Tiidus | 1386 |
14.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 33 | Urmas Klaas | 1542 |
13.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 34 | Kristen Michal | 1213 |
12.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 35 | Peep Aru | 1948 |
12.0%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 36 | Tarmo Mänd | 562 |
11.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 37 | Kalmer Lain | 182 |
11.0%
|
100.0%
|
97.7%
|
| 38 | Jüri Jaanson | 1948 |
10.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 39 | Kalle Jents | 1948 |
10.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 40 | Kalev Lillo | 1948 |
10.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 41 | Aare Heinvee | 1948 |
6.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 42 | Meelis Mälberg | 1948 |
6.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 43 | Rein Aidma | 1948 |
4.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 44 | Aivar Rosenberg | 405 |
3.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.