ML

Deputy

Margus Lepik

Voting bloc: 59 vote alike · 11. term

2
Terms served
1
Policy votes
100.0%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 45%Against · 51%Abstained · 4%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Non-attached
100.0%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 100.0
Present but silent % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1 − 0) / 1 = 100.0%

Registered 1 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1
For: 0 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

ℹ️ Very high inactivity usually means the person served as a minister or Prime Minister (the cabinet doesn't vote) or left parliament mid-term.

11. term Non-attached
8.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 8.8
Present but silent % 8.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1684 − 1535) / 1684 = 8.8%

Registered 1684 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1684
For: 724 · Against: 811 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 65 · Absent: 0

Parties

termParties
12. term Non-attached
11. term Non-attached

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2010-03-24 Lõpphääletus For
2010-03-24 Lükata tagasi For
2010-03-24 Arutelu katkestamine Against
2010-03-24 139. parandus Against
2010-03-24 100. parandus Against
2010-03-24 99. parandus Against
2010-03-24 98. parandus Against
2010-03-24 97. parandus Against
2010-03-24 96. parandus Against
2010-03-24 95. parandus Against
2010-03-24 94. parandus Against
2010-03-24 93. parandus Against
2010-03-24 92. parandus Against
2010-03-24 91. parandus Against
2010-03-24 90. parandus Against
2010-03-24 89. parandus Against
2010-03-24 88. parandus Against
2010-03-24 87. parandus Against
2010-03-24 85. parandus Against
2010-03-24 84. parandus Against
2010-03-24 83. parandus Against
2010-03-24 82. parandus Against
2010-03-24 81. parandus Against
2010-03-24 80. parandus Against
2010-03-24 79. parandus Against
2010-03-24 78. parandus Against
2010-03-24 77. parandus Against
2010-03-24 76. parandus Against
2010-03-24 75. parandus Against
2010-03-24 74. parandus Against
2010-03-24 73. parandus Against
2010-03-24 72. parandus Against
2010-03-24 71. parandus Against
2010-03-24 70. parandus Against
2010-03-24 69. parandus Against
2010-03-24 68. parandus Against
2010-03-24 67. parandus Against
2010-03-24 66. parandus Against
2010-03-24 65. parandus Against
2010-03-24 64. parandus Did not vote
2010-03-24 63. parandus Did not vote
2010-03-24 62. parandus Against
2010-03-24 61. parandus Against
2010-03-24 60. parandus Against
2010-03-24 59. parandus Against
2010-03-24 58. parandus Against
2010-03-24 57. parandus Against
2010-03-24 56. parandus Against
2010-03-24 55. parandus Against
2010-03-24 54. parandus Against