ML

Deputy

Margus Lepik

Voting bloc: 59 vote alike · 11. term

2
Terms served
1
Policy votes
100.0%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 45%Against · 51%Abstained · 4%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Non-attached
100.0%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 100.0
Present but silent % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1 − 0) / 1 = 100.0%

Registered 1 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1
For: 0 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

ℹ️ Very high inactivity usually means the person served as a minister or Prime Minister (the cabinet doesn't vote) or left parliament mid-term.

11. term Non-attached
8.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 8.8
Present but silent % 8.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1684 − 1535) / 1684 = 8.8%

Registered 1684 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1684
For: 724 · Against: 811 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 65 · Absent: 0

Parties

termParties
12. term Non-attached
11. term Non-attached

Votes

DateVote motionResult
2010-03-24 53. parandus Against
2010-03-24 52. parandus Against
2010-03-24 51. parandus Against
2010-03-24 50. parandus Against
2010-03-24 49. parandus Against
2010-03-24 48. parandus Against
2010-03-24 47. parandus Against
2010-03-24 46. parandus Against
2010-03-24 44. parandus Against
2010-03-24 43. parandus Against
2010-03-24 42. parandus Against
2010-03-24 41. parandus Against
2010-03-24 40. parandus Against
2010-03-24 39. parandus Against
2010-03-24 38. parandus Against
2010-03-24 37. parandus Against
2010-03-24 36. parandus Against
2010-03-24 35. parandus Against
2010-03-24 34. parandus Against
2010-03-24 34. parandus Against
2010-03-24 33. parandus Against
2010-03-24 32. parandus Against
2010-03-24 31. parandus Against
2010-03-24 30. parandus Against
2010-03-24 29. parandus Against
2010-03-24 28. parandus Against
2010-03-24 27. parandus Against
2010-03-24 26. parandus Against
2010-03-24 25. parandus Against
2010-03-24 24. parandus Against
2010-03-24 23. parandus Against
2010-03-24 22. parandus Against
2010-03-24 21. parandus Against
2010-03-24 20. parandus Against
2010-03-24 19. parandus Against
2010-03-24 18. parandus Against
2010-03-24 17. parandus Against
2010-03-24 16. parandus Against
2010-03-24 15. parandus Against
2010-03-24 14. parandus Against
2010-03-24 13. parandus Against
2010-03-24 12. parandus Against
2010-03-24 11. parandus Against
2010-03-24 10. parandus Against
2010-03-24 9. parandus Against
2010-03-24 7. parandus Against
2010-03-24 6. parandus Against
2010-03-24 5. parandus Against
2010-03-24 4. parandus Against
2010-03-24 3. parandus Against