Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1601) / 2067 = 22.5%
Registered 2067 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2067
For: 770 · Against: 831 ·
Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 235 ·
Absent: 0
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 1230) / 2557 = 51.9%
Registered 2557 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2557
For: 1014 · Against: 216 ·
Abstain: 12 · Did not vote: 858 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Mait Klaassen 100% agreement
- Mart Laar 100% agreement
- Trivimi Velliste 100% agreement
- Margus Tsahkna 100% agreement
- Mart Nutt 100% agreement
- Toomas Tõniste 100% agreement
- Kaia Iva 100% agreement
- Mari-Ann Kelam 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Ivari Padar 18% agreement
- Aadu Must 31% agreement
- Evelyn Sepp 31% agreement
- Vilja Toomast 31% agreement
- Eldar Efendijev 31% agreement
- Heimar Lenk 32% agreement
- Mai Treial 33% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 33% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 11. term | — Non-attached |
| 10. term | Isamaaliidu fraktsioon Isamaaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17.11.2005 | 89. parandus | Absent |
| 17.11.2005 | 88. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 87. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 86. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 85. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 84. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 83. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 82. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 81. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 80. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 79. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 78. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 77. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 76. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 75. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 74. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 73. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 72. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 71. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 70. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 69. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 68. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 67. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 66. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 65. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 64. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 63. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 62. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 61. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 60. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 59. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 58. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 57. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 56. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 55. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 54. parandus | For |
| 17.11.2005 | 53. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 52. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 51. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 50. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 49. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 48. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 47. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 46. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 45. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 44. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 43. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 42. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 41. parandus | Did not vote |
| 17.11.2005 | 40. parandus | Did not vote |