Isamaaliidu fraktsioon
8
Deputies
99%
Cohesion
54.8%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 48%Against · 11%Abstained · 41%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mart Laar | 2557 |
84.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 2 | Mart Nutt | 1601 |
57.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 3 | Tõnis Lukas | 2557 |
56.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 4 | Peeter Tulviste | 2557 |
51.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 5 | Tunne-Väldo Kelam | 956 |
48.1%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 6 | Andres Herkel | 2557 |
47.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 7 | Helir-Valdor Seeder | 2557 |
46.3%
|
100.0%
|
97.9%
|
| 8 | Trivimi Velliste | 2557 |
45.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.