Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1407 − 659) / 1407 = 53.2%
Registered 1406 · Absent 1
· Votes available 1407
For: 460 · Against: 199 ·
Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 580 ·
Absent: 1
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3 − 3) / 3 = 0.0%
Registered 3 · Absent 0
· Votes available 3
For: 0 · Against: 3 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Andres Metsoja 100% agreement
- Helir-Valdor Seeder 99% agreement
- Urmas Reinsalu 99% agreement
- Tõnis Lukas 99% agreement
- Aivar Kokk 98% agreement
- Priit Sibul 98% agreement
- Mart Maastik 98% agreement
- Jaanus Karilaid 98% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Hele Everaus 28% agreement
- Mihkel Lees 30% agreement
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 30% agreement
- Karmen Joller 31% agreement
- Madis Timpson 31% agreement
- Vilja Toomast 32% agreement
- Anti Haugas 32% agreement
- Andres Sutt 32% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 15. term | Isamaa fraktsioon Isamaa |
| 14. term | Isamaa fraktsioon Isamaa |