Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (562 − 495) / 562 = 11.9%
Registered 562 · Absent 0
· Votes available 562
For: 346 · Against: 149 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 58 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2065 − 1586) / 2065 = 23.2%
Registered 2065 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2065
For: 1132 · Against: 454 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 389 ·
Absent: 0
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Innar Mäesalu 100% agreement
- Urmas Klaas 100% agreement
- Terje Trei 100% agreement
- Kaja Kallas 100% agreement
- Jürgen Ligi 100% agreement
- Andrus Ansip 100% agreement
- Aivar Sõerd 100% agreement
- Kalev Lillo 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Mihhail Stalnuhhin 32% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 47% agreement
- Eldar Efendijev 47% agreement
- Heimar Lenk 50% agreement
- Helmen Kütt 50% agreement
- Mailis Reps 50% agreement
- Mihhail Korb 51% agreement
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 53% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 12. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
| 11. term | — Non-attached |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2010-11-18 | 95. parandus&# 822 SE II | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 94. parandus&# 822 SE II | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 93. parandus&# 822 SE II | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 92. parandus&# 822 SE II | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 91. parandus&# 822 SE II | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 90. parandus&# 822 SE II | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 89. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 88. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 87. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 86. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 85. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 84. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 82. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 81. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 80. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 79. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 78. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 77. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 76. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 75. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 74. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 73. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 72. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 71. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 70. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 69. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 68. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 67. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 66. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 65. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 64. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 63. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2010-11-18 | 62. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2010-11-18 | 61. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2010-11-18 | 60. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2010-11-18 | 59. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2010-11-18 | 58. parandus | Did not vote |
| 2010-11-18 | 57. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 56. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 55. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 54. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 53. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 51. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 50. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 49. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 48. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 47. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 46. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 45. parandus | Against |
| 2010-11-18 | 44. parandus | Against |