Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (491 − 372) / 491 = 24.2%
Registered 491 · Absent 0
· Votes available 491
For: 265 · Against: 107 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 76 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1872 − 906) / 1872 = 51.6%
Registered 1872 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1872
For: 590 · Against: 316 ·
Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 778 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 809) / 4466 = 81.9%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 694 · Against: 115 ·
Abstain: 61 · Did not vote: 1751 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
ℹ️ Very high inactivity usually means the person served as a minister or Prime Minister (the cabinet doesn't vote) or left parliament mid-term.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Andres Anvelt 100% agreement
- Jaan Õunapuu 100% agreement
- Etti Kagarov 100% agreement
- Rein Randver 100% agreement
- Tatjana Jaanson 100% agreement
- Kalev Kotkas 99% agreement
- Neeme Suur 99% agreement
- Karel Rüütli 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Mihhail Stalnuhhin 38% agreement
- Tõnis Palts 46% agreement
- Vladimir Velman 53% agreement
- Helir-Valdor Seeder 53% agreement
- Margus Tsahkna 54% agreement
- Toomas Tõniste 54% agreement
- Mihhail Korb 55% agreement
- Urbo Vaarmann 55% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 12. term | Sotsiaaldemokraatliku Erakonna fraktsioon Social Democrats |
| 10. term | Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon |
| 9. term | Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon Eestimaa Rahvaliidu fraktsioon |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12.05.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | Did not vote |
| 11.05.1999 | 67 | For |
| 11.05.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | Did not vote |
| 11.05.1999 | 61 | Did not vote |
| 10.05.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | Did not vote |
| 10.05.1999 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | Did not vote |
| 29.04.1999 | 40 | For |
| 29.04.1999 | 10. parandus | For |
| 29.04.1999 | 9. parandus | For |
| 29.04.1999 | 5. parandus | Did not vote |
| 29.04.1999 | 3. parandus | Did not vote |
| 29.04.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | For |
| 29.04.1999 | Eelnôu menetlusest välja 43 | Did not vote |
| 29.04.1999 | Eelnôu menetlusest välja 45 | Did not vote |
| 28.04.1999 | 25 | For |
| 28.04.1999 | 24 | For |
| 28.04.1999 | 27 | For |
| 27.04.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | For |
| 27.04.1999 | Arutelu katkestamine | Did not vote |
| 27.04.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | For |
| 27.04.1999 | 51 | For |
| 27.04.1999 | 15. parandus | For |
| 22.04.1999 | 55 | Did not vote |
| 22.04.1999 | 1. parandus | Did not vote |
| 22.04.1999 | 37 | For |
| 21.04.1999 | 50 | For |
| 14.04.1999 | .. | Did not vote |
| 14.04.1999 | Läbirääkimiste lôpetamine | For |
| 13.04.1999 | — | Did not vote |