Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1855 − 1418) / 1855 = 23.6%
Registered 1855 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1855
For: 947 · Against: 471 ·
Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 341 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1629 − 1109) / 1629 = 31.9%
Registered 1629 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1629
For: 818 · Against: 291 ·
Abstain: 18 · Did not vote: 383 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Rein Suurkask 100% agreement
- Riho Breivel 100% agreement
- Alar Laneman 99% agreement
- Kalev Kallo 99% agreement
- Leo Kunnas 99% agreement
- Kai Rimmel 99% agreement
- Henn Põlluaas 99% agreement
- Peeter Ernits 99% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Tiiu Aro 34% agreement
- Aivar Viidik 36% agreement
- Eerik-Niiles Kross 36% agreement
- Erkki Keldo 37% agreement
- Õnne Pillak 37% agreement
- Toomas Järveoja 37% agreement
- Timo Suslov 37% agreement
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 37% agreement