Eesti Konservatiivse Rahvaerakonna fraktsioon
7
Deputies
97%
Cohesion
39.4%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 50%Against · 18%Abstained · 32%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mart Helme | 1629 |
51.9%
|
100.0%
|
96.3%
|
| 2 | Jaak Madison | 1629 |
51.6%
|
100.0%
|
97.2%
|
| 3 | Martin Helme | 1629 |
39.7%
|
100.0%
|
97.7%
|
| 4 | Henn Põlluaas | 1629 |
39.5%
|
100.0%
|
96.7%
|
| 5 | Raivo Põldaru | 1629 |
33.4%
|
100.0%
|
97.6%
|
| 6 | Uno Kaskpeit | 1629 |
31.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 7 | Arno Sild | 1629 |
28.1%
|
100.0%
|
96.1%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.