Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1629 − 831) / 1629 = 49.0%
Registered 1629 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1629
For: 532 · Against: 299 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 420 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 687) / 1948 = 64.7%
Registered 1948 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1948
For: 533 · Against: 154 ·
Abstain: 6 · Did not vote: 576 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1006) / 2067 = 51.3%
Registered 2067 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2067
For: 842 · Against: 164 ·
Abstain: 6 · Did not vote: 588 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 1632) / 2557 = 36.2%
Registered 2557 · Absent 0
· Votes available 2557
For: 1143 · Against: 489 ·
Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 720 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2115) / 4466 = 52.6%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 1414 · Against: 701 ·
Abstain: 54 · Did not vote: 1466 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Rein Randver 100% agreement
- Marko Šorin 100% agreement
- Eevi Paasmäe 100% agreement
- Toomas Väinaste 100% agreement
- Dmitri Dmitrijev 100% agreement
- Kersti Sarapuu 100% agreement
- Marika Tuus-Laul 100% agreement
- Tiit Terik 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jüri Adams 40% agreement
- Igor Gräzin 44% agreement
- Imre Sooäär 45% agreement
- Eerik-Niiles Kross 46% agreement
- Jaak Madison 47% agreement
- Martin Kukk 47% agreement
- Mihkel Raud 48% agreement
- Mart Helme 49% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 13. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 12. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 11. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 10. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 9. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16.11.2000 | 402 SE | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 11. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 1. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | Läbirääkimiste lõpetamine | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 462 SE | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 5. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 2. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | Läbirääkimiste lõpetamine | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 288. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 287. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 286. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 285. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 284. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 266. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 265. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 264. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 263. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 257. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 255. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 250. parandus | For |
| 16.11.2000 | 248. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 247. parandus | Did not vote |
| 16.11.2000 | 244. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 243. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 242. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 241. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 240. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 239. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 238. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 234. parandus | Did not vote |
| 15.11.2000 | 233. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 232. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 229. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 227. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 224. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 223. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 221. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 220. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 219. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 218. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 210. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 209. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 208. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 206. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 205. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 204. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 201. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 192. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 190. parandus | For |
| 15.11.2000 | 189. parandus | Did not vote |