Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon
38
Deputies
99%
Cohesion
29.6%
Inactivity %
99.9%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 52%Against · 25%Abstained · 23%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin Repinski | 1321 |
52.9%
|
97.5%
|
99.1%
|
| 2 | Mailis Reps | 679 |
52.7%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 3 | Jüri Ratas | 679 |
51.0%
|
100.0%
|
97.0%
|
| 4 | Olga Ivanova | 1629 |
50.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.5%
|
| 5 | Vladimir Velman | 1629 |
49.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 6 | Priit Toobal | 180 |
48.9%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 7 | Heimar Lenk | 1629 |
48.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 8 | Lauri Laasi | 187 |
47.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 9 | Rein Ratas | 684 |
45.8%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 10 | Kadri Simson | 679 |
40.8%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 11 | Karin Tammemägi | 533 |
40.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.7%
|
| 12 | Siret Kotka | 1629 |
39.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 13 | Oudekki Loone | 1442 |
38.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.5%
|
| 14 | Mihhail Stalnuhhin | 1629 |
37.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 15 | Andrei Novikov | 1096 |
37.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 16 | Mihhail Korb | 1338 |
35.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 17 | Jaanus Karilaid | 1626 |
34.3%
|
100.0%
|
97.9%
|
| 18 | Marika Tuus-Laul | 1629 |
29.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 19 | Viktor Vassiljev | 1629 |
28.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 20 | Toomas Vitsut | 1629 |
28.2%
|
100.0%
|
98.2%
|
| 21 | Dmitri Dmitrijev | 1629 |
26.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 22 | Aadu Must | 1629 |
25.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 23 | Erki Savisaar | 1629 |
24.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 24 | Enn Eesmaa | 1629 |
23.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 25 | Märt Sults | 1629 |
22.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.2%
|
| 26 | Anneli Ott | 1449 |
22.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 27 | Valeri Korb | 1629 |
22.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 28 | Peeter Ernits | 1539 |
21.6%
|
100.0%
|
95.9%
|
| 29 | Tarmo Tamm | 713 |
19.2%
|
100.0%
|
98.3%
|
| 30 | Kersti Sarapuu | 1629 |
19.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 31 | Tiit Terik | 950 |
10.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 32 | Toomas Väinaste | 950 |
9.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 33 | Igor Kravtšenko | 944 |
9.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 34 | Eevi Paasmäe | 308 |
8.8%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 35 | Helmut Hallemaa | 950 |
8.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 36 | Toomas Paur | 916 |
6.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 37 | Marko Šorin | 287 |
5.6%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 38 | Kalev Kallo | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.