Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon
16
Deputies
100%
Cohesion
12.7%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 45%Against · 45%Abstained · 10%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Imre Sooäär | 2067 |
33.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 2 | Tõnu Juul | 1788 |
27.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 3 | Igor Gräzin | 2067 |
23.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.3%
|
| 4 | Kalle Palling | 2067 |
18.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 5 | Tõnis Kõiv | 2067 |
16.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 6 | Maret Maripuu | 1116 |
15.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 7 | Paul-Erik Rummo | 2064 |
15.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 8 | Mati Raidma | 2067 |
12.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 9 | Lauri Luik | 2067 |
9.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 10 | Peep Aru | 2067 |
9.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 11 | Urmas Klaas | 2067 |
8.4%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 12 | Väino Linde | 2067 |
8.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.7%
|
| 13 | Rein Aidma | 2067 |
3.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 14 | Kristen Michal | 81 |
1.2%
|
100.0%
|
97.5%
|
| 15 | Laine Randjärv | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 16 | Jaanus Tamkivi | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.