Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon
13
Deputies
100%
Cohesion
20.8%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 44%Against · 45%Abstained · 11%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mart Laar | 2067 |
34.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 2 | Tõnis Lukas | 3 |
33.3%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 3 | Marko Mihkelson | 2067 |
32.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 4 | Mart Nutt | 2067 |
26.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 5 | Liisa-Ly Pakosta | 804 |
23.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 6 | Margus Tsahkna | 2064 |
21.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 7 | Andres Herkel | 2067 |
19.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 8 | Kaia Iva | 2067 |
16.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 9 | Ene Ergma | 2067 |
15.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 10 | Erki Nool | 2067 |
15.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 11 | Marko Pomerants | 1056 |
11.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 12 | Sven Sester | 831 |
10.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 13 | Toomas Tõniste | 2067 |
9.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.