Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon
32
Deputies
99%
Cohesion
32.2%
Inactivity %
99.7%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 43%Against · 40%Abstained · 17%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mart Laar | 587 |
92.3%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 2 | Ken-Marti Vaher | 415 |
69.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 3 | Juhan Parts | 415 |
69.2%
|
100.0%
|
96.0%
|
| 4 | Reet Roos | 1787 |
56.7%
|
91.7%
|
100.0%
|
| 5 | Jaak Aaviksoo | 415 |
56.4%
|
100.0%
|
96.7%
|
| 6 | Tõnis Palts | 1948 |
48.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 7 | Helir-Valdor Seeder | 415 |
47.7%
|
100.0%
|
92.4%
|
| 8 | Siim Kabrits | 1533 |
42.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 9 | Siim Kiisler | 415 |
42.2%
|
100.0%
|
95.4%
|
| 10 | Marko Mihkelson | 1948 |
39.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 11 | Juku-Kalle Raid | 1533 |
37.3%
|
100.0%
|
94.1%
|
| 12 | Urmas Reinsalu | 722 |
32.4%
|
100.0%
|
96.8%
|
| 13 | Andres Herkel | 1948 |
27.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 14 | Liisa-Ly Pakosta | 1945 |
25.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 15 | Margus Tsahkna | 1948 |
25.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 16 | Erki Nool | 1948 |
25.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 17 | Ene Ergma | 1948 |
24.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 18 | Lauri Vahtre | 161 |
24.2%
|
100.0%
|
94.6%
|
| 19 | Kaia Iva | 1948 |
21.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 20 | Andres Jalak | 1369 |
21.3%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 21 | Sven Sester | 1948 |
20.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 22 | Tõnis Lukas | 771 |
20.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 23 | Aivar Kokk | 1948 |
20.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 24 | Annely Akkermann | 1948 |
19.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 25 | Marko Pomerants | 1948 |
18.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 26 | Mart Nutt | 1226 |
18.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 27 | Toomas Tõniste | 1948 |
17.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 28 | Priit Sibul | 1948 |
17.1%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 29 | Kaja Kreisman | 764 |
14.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 30 | Ülo Tulik | 1533 |
13.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 31 | Andrus Saare | 1361 |
10.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 32 | Peeter Laurson | 1945 |
10.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.