Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon
40
Deputies
98%
Cohesion
35.1%
Inactivity %
99.7%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 53%Against · 22%Abstained · 25%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taavi Rõivas | 948 |
56.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 2 | Eerik-Niiles Kross | 1354 |
53.7%
|
100.0%
|
97.5%
|
| 3 | Keit Pentus-Rosimannus | 1542 |
51.9%
|
94.7%
|
98.9%
|
| 4 | Jürgen Ligi | 948 |
50.4%
|
100.0%
|
93.6%
|
| 5 | Kalle Palling | 1629 |
50.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 6 | Arto Aas | 948 |
49.3%
|
100.0%
|
93.3%
|
| 7 | Aivar Surva | 274 |
47.4%
|
100.0%
|
97.9%
|
| 8 | Johannes Kert | 1629 |
44.2%
|
100.0%
|
98.7%
|
| 9 | Imre Sooäär | 681 |
43.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.0%
|
| 10 | Kristen Michal | 948 |
43.0%
|
100.0%
|
96.4%
|
| 11 | Toomas Kivimägi | 1629 |
42.7%
|
100.0%
|
98.4%
|
| 12 | Igor Gräzin | 1356 |
42.4%
|
100.0%
|
96.3%
|
| 13 | Remo Holsmer | 1297 |
39.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 14 | Rait Maruste | 83 |
39.8%
|
100.0%
|
98.1%
|
| 15 | Hanno Pevkur | 948 |
39.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.3%
|
| 16 | Heidy Purga | 1629 |
38.2%
|
100.0%
|
97.7%
|
| 17 | Deniss Boroditš | 1355 |
37.8%
|
100.0%
|
98.0%
|
| 18 | Yoko Alender | 1629 |
37.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 19 | Martin Kukk | 599 |
36.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 20 | Peep Aru | 416 |
35.3%
|
100.0%
|
95.2%
|
| 21 | Anne Sulling | 1629 |
33.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 22 | Lauri Luik | 1629 |
33.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.3%
|
| 23 | Terje Trei | 1629 |
33.0%
|
100.0%
|
95.9%
|
| 24 | Ivi Eenmaa | 157 |
32.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 25 | Valdo Randpere | 1629 |
32.5%
|
100.0%
|
96.8%
|
| 26 | Kalle Laanet | 1629 |
31.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 27 | Laine Randjärv | 1559 |
31.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.4%
|
| 28 | Liina Kersna | 1629 |
30.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 29 | Urmas Kruuse | 948 |
29.6%
|
100.0%
|
96.2%
|
| 30 | Maris Lauri | 1547 |
27.6%
|
95.0%
|
98.7%
|
| 31 | Aivar Sõerd | 1629 |
26.4%
|
100.0%
|
97.8%
|
| 32 | Madis Milling | 1629 |
25.1%
|
100.0%
|
98.1%
|
| 33 | Urve Tiidus | 1629 |
24.1%
|
100.0%
|
98.2%
|
| 34 | Mati Raidma | 954 |
23.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 35 | Meelis Mälberg | 1627 |
21.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 36 | Ants Laaneots | 1629 |
20.6%
|
100.0%
|
97.0%
|
| 37 | Vilja Toomast | 955 |
19.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 38 | Jüri Jaanson | 1629 |
18.4%
|
100.0%
|
98.0%
|
| 39 | Kristjan Kõljalg | 681 |
17.2%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 40 | Andre Sepp | 681 |
13.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.