Eesti Vabaerakonna fraktsioon
10
Deputies
95%
Cohesion
32.7%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 59%Against · 13%Abstained · 28%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jüri Adams | 1629 |
71.0%
|
100.0%
|
84.7%
|
| 2 | Artur Talvik | 1629 |
49.4%
|
100.0%
|
93.6%
|
| 3 | Ain Lutsepp | 1629 |
38.6%
|
100.0%
|
95.1%
|
| 4 | Külliki Kübarsepp | 1539 |
30.6%
|
100.0%
|
94.5%
|
| 5 | Monika Haukanõmm | 1629 |
28.0%
|
100.0%
|
96.2%
|
| 6 | Andres Herkel | 1629 |
27.5%
|
100.0%
|
95.2%
|
| 7 | Andres Ammas | 1281 |
26.4%
|
100.0%
|
94.6%
|
| 8 | Enn Meri | 348 |
24.7%
|
100.0%
|
97.0%
|
| 9 | Jüri Saar | 90 |
15.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.7%
|
| 10 | Krista Aru | 1629 |
15.0%
|
100.0%
|
96.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.