Isamaa ja Res Publica Liidu fraktsioon
20
Deputies
99%
Cohesion
26.5%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 50%Against · 34%Abstained · 16%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marko Mihkelson | 1629 |
58.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 2 | Urmas Reinsalu | 2 |
50.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 3 | Jaak Aaviksoo | 92 |
43.5%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 4 | Ken-Marti Vaher | 932 |
42.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 5 | Juhan Parts | 808 |
39.6%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 6 | Tiina Kangro | 821 |
31.4%
|
100.0%
|
96.9%
|
| 7 | Helir-Valdor Seeder | 1629 |
29.0%
|
100.0%
|
98.6%
|
| 8 | Aivar Kokk | 1629 |
28.4%
|
100.0%
|
98.8%
|
| 9 | Kalle Muuli | 968 |
26.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 10 | Einar Vallbaum | 968 |
25.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 11 | Mart Nutt | 1627 |
24.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 12 | Raivo Aeg | 1629 |
19.1%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 13 | Viktoria Ladõnskaja-Kubits | 1629 |
18.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 14 | Siim Kiisler | 878 |
16.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 15 | Maire Aunaste | 1629 |
16.3%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 16 | Sven Sester | 659 |
16.2%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 17 | Andres Metsoja | 1629 |
14.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.1%
|
| 18 | Tarmo Kruusimäe | 696 |
10.1%
|
100.0%
|
97.5%
|
| 19 | Marko Pomerants | 661 |
9.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 20 | Priit Sibul | 1629 |
9.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.