Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon
38
Deputies
100%
Cohesion
24.1%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
0
Bills initiated
0
Questions & requests
For · 45%Against · 37%Abstained · 19%
Cohesion is the faction's average party loyalty — how often its members vote with the group's majority stance on policy votes.
| # | Deputy | Policy votes | Inactivity % | Attendance % | Party loyalty % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin Repinski | 1855 |
56.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 2 | Mailis Reps | 1402 |
51.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 3 | Aadu Must | 1855 |
43.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 4 | Kadri Simson | 45 |
42.2%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 5 | Jüri Ratas | 1326 |
40.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 6 | Taavi Aas | 553 |
40.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.4%
|
| 7 | Siret Kotka | 1855 |
39.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 8 | Anneli Ott | 1424 |
38.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.5%
|
| 9 | Mihhail Korb | 1855 |
38.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 10 | Mihhail Stalnuhhin | 1855 |
35.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 11 | Maria Jufereva-Skuratovski | 1858 |
32.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 12 | Kaido Höövelson | 1855 |
29.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.2%
|
| 13 | Jaak Aab | 556 |
29.7%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 14 | Tõnis Mölder | 1418 |
27.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 15 | Igor Kravtšenko | 1855 |
27.4%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 16 | Erki Savisaar | 1525 |
27.3%
|
100.0%
|
98.9%
|
| 17 | Oudekki Loone | 1302 |
26.8%
|
100.0%
|
97.2%
|
| 18 | Marko Šorin | 1810 |
24.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 19 | Kersti Sarapuu | 1858 |
23.9%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 20 | Marika Tuus-Laul | 1855 |
23.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.6%
|
| 21 | Andrei Korobeinik | 1293 |
23.4%
|
99.1%
|
99.0%
|
| 22 | Enn Eesmaa | 1858 |
23.0%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 23 | Dmitri Dmitrijev | 1855 |
22.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.8%
|
| 24 | Tarmo Tamm | 1858 |
21.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 25 | Jaanus Karilaid | 1858 |
20.7%
|
100.0%
|
99.3%
|
| 26 | Marek Jürgenson | 1855 |
20.6%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 27 | Viktor Vassiljev | 1855 |
20.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 28 | Natalia Malleus | 1851 |
18.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.9%
|
| 29 | Kalev Kallo | 469 |
17.5%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 30 | Imre Sooäär | 431 |
15.5%
|
100.0%
|
98.5%
|
| 31 | Peeter Rahnel | 1302 |
10.8%
|
100.0%
|
99.7%
|
| 32 | Ester Karuse | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 33 | Aleksei Jevgrafov | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 34 | Aleksandr Tšaplõgin | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 35 | Lauri Laats | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 36 | Andre Hanimägi | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 37 | Tanel Kiik | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
| 38 | Vadim Belobrovtsev | 3 |
0.0%
|
100.0%
|
100.0%
|
How is this calculated?
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.