Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (681 − 592) / 681 = 13.1%
Registered 681 · Absent 0
· Votes available 681
For: 331 · Against: 261 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 71 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1945 − 1613) / 1945 = 17.1%
Registered 1848 · Absent 97
· Votes available 1945
For: 836 · Against: 777 ·
Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 187 ·
Absent: 97
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Aivar Sõerd 100% agreement
- Urve Tiidus 100% agreement
- Kalle Laanet 100% agreement
- Maris Lauri 100% agreement
- Liina Kersna 100% agreement
- Valdo Randpere 100% agreement
- Yoko Alender 100% agreement
- Vilja Toomast 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jüri Adams 24% agreement
- Mart Helme 31% agreement
- Mailis Reps 35% agreement
- Martin Helme 36% agreement
- Martin Repinski 37% agreement
- Raivo Põldaru 37% agreement
- Arno Sild 37% agreement
- Jüri Ratas 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 13. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
| 12. term | Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 05.06.2012 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 05.06.2012 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 04.06.2012 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 30.05.2012 | 44. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 8. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 4. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | Arutelu katkestamine | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 6. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 5. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | Arutelu katkestamine | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 5. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | 4. parandus | Against |
| 30.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 30.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 30.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 29.05.2012 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 28.05.2012 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 16.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 15.05.2012 | Lükata tagasi | For |
| 14.05.2012 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 10.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 10.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 08.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 08.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 07.05.2012 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 03.05.2012 | Arutelu katkestamine | Against |
| 03.05.2012 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 03.05.2012 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 03.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | 9. parandus | Against |
| 02.05.2012 | 8. parandus | Against |
| 02.05.2012 | 6. parandus | Against |
| 02.05.2012 | 5. parandus | Against |
| 02.05.2012 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 02.05.2012 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 02.05.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 30.04.2012 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 19.04.2012 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 18.04.2012 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 18.04.2012 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 18.04.2012 | 7. parandus | Against |