JT

Reform Party

Jaanus Tamkivi

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

3
Terms served
1948
Policy votes
15.9%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 49%Against · 39%Abstained · 12%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

15.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 15.9
Present but silent % 15.9
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1638) / 1948 = 15.9%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 904 · Against: 734 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 252 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

0.0%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 0.0
Present but silent % 0.0
Party loyalty % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3 − 3) / 3 = 0.0%

Registered 3 · Absent 0 · Votes available 3
For: 3 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 11.8
Present but silent % 11.8
Party loyalty % 99.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (955 − 842) / 955 = 11.8%

Registered 955 · Absent 0 · Votes available 955
For: 478 · Against: 364 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 80 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
15.11.2006 51. parandus Against
15.11.2006 50. parandus Against
15.11.2006 49. parandus Against
15.11.2006 48. parandus Against
15.11.2006 47. parandus Against
15.11.2006 46. parandus Against
15.11.2006 45. parandus Against
15.11.2006 44. parandus Against
15.11.2006 43. parandus Against
15.11.2006 42. parandus Against
15.11.2006 41. parandus Against
15.11.2006 40. parandus Against
15.11.2006 39. parandus Against
15.11.2006 38. parandus Against
15.11.2006 37. parandus Against
15.11.2006 36. parandus Against
15.11.2006 35. parandus Against
15.11.2006 34. parandus Against
15.11.2006 33. parandus Against
15.11.2006 32. parandus Against
15.11.2006 31. parandus Against
15.11.2006 30. parandus Against
15.11.2006 29. parandus Against
15.11.2006 28. parandus Against
15.11.2006 27. parandus Against
15.11.2006 26. parandus Against
15.11.2006 25. parandus Against
15.11.2006 24. parandus Against
15.11.2006 23. parandus Against
15.11.2006 22. parandus Against
15.11.2006 21. parandus Against
15.11.2006 20. parandus Against
15.11.2006 19. parandus Against
15.11.2006 18. parandus Against
15.11.2006 17. parandus Against
15.11.2006 16. parandus Against
15.11.2006 15. parandus Against
15.11.2006 14. parandus Against
15.11.2006 13. parandus Against
15.11.2006 12. parandus Against
15.11.2006 11. parandus Against
15.11.2006 10. parandus Against
15.11.2006 9. parandus Against
15.11.2006 8. parandus Against
15.11.2006 7. parandus Against
15.11.2006 6. parandus Against
15.11.2006 5. parandus Against
15.11.2006 4. parandus Against
15.11.2006 3. parandus Against
15.11.2006 Lõpphääletus For