JT

Reform Party

Jaanus Tamkivi

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

3
Terms served
1948
Policy votes
15.9%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 49%Against · 39%Abstained · 12%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

15.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 15.9
Present but silent % 15.9
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1638) / 1948 = 15.9%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 904 · Against: 734 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 252 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

0.0%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 0.0
Present but silent % 0.0
Party loyalty % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3 − 3) / 3 = 0.0%

Registered 3 · Absent 0 · Votes available 3
For: 3 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 11.8
Present but silent % 11.8
Party loyalty % 99.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (955 − 842) / 955 = 11.8%

Registered 955 · Absent 0 · Votes available 955
For: 478 · Against: 364 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 80 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
17.11.2005 73. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 72. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 71. parandus Against
17.11.2005 70. parandus Against
17.11.2005 69. parandus Against
17.11.2005 68. parandus Against
17.11.2005 67. parandus Against
17.11.2005 66. parandus Against
17.11.2005 65. parandus Against
17.11.2005 64. parandus Against
17.11.2005 63. parandus Against
17.11.2005 62. parandus Against
17.11.2005 61. parandus Against
17.11.2005 60. parandus Against
17.11.2005 59. parandus Against
17.11.2005 58. parandus Against
17.11.2005 57. parandus Against
17.11.2005 56. parandus Against
17.11.2005 55. parandus Against
17.11.2005 54. parandus Against
17.11.2005 53. parandus Against
17.11.2005 52. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 51. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 50. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 49. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 48. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 47. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 46. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 45. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 44. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 43. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 42. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 41. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 40. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 39. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 38. parandus Did not vote
17.11.2005 37. parandus Did not vote
16.11.2005 36. parandus Against
16.11.2005 35. parandus Against
16.11.2005 34. parandus Against
16.11.2005 33. parandus Against
16.11.2005 32. parandus Against
16.11.2005 31. parandus Against
16.11.2005 30. parandus Against
16.11.2005 29. parandus Against
16.11.2005 28. parandus Against
16.11.2005 27. parandus Against
16.11.2005 26. parandus Against
16.11.2005 25. parandus Against
16.11.2005 24. parandus Against