JT

Reform Party

Jaanus Tamkivi

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

3
Terms served
1948
Policy votes
15.9%
Inactivity %
100.0%
Attendance %
For · 49%Against · 39%Abstained · 12%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

15.9%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 15.9
Present but silent % 15.9
Party loyalty % 99.7
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1638) / 1948 = 15.9%

Registered 1948 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1948
For: 904 · Against: 734 · Abstain: 1 · Did not vote: 252 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

0.0%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 0.0
Present but silent % 0.0
Party loyalty % 100.0
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3 − 3) / 3 = 0.0%

Registered 3 · Absent 0 · Votes available 3
For: 3 · Against: 0 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11.8%
Inactivity %
Attendance % 100.0
Inactivity % 11.8
Present but silent % 11.8
Party loyalty % 99.8
How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (955 − 842) / 955 = 11.8%

Registered 955 · Absent 0 · Votes available 955
For: 478 · Against: 364 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 80 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Votes most unlike

Votes

DateVote motionResult
25.10.2005 Lükata tagasi For
25.10.2005 Lükata tagasi For
25.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
25.10.2005 Lõpphääletus Did not vote
24.10.2005 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
20.10.2005 Lükata tagasi For
20.10.2005 Arutelu katkestamine Against
20.10.2005 23. parandus For
20.10.2005 21. parandus Against
20.10.2005 12. parandus Against
20.10.2005 11. parandus Against
20.10.2005 10. parandus Against
20.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
20.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
19.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
19.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
19.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
19.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
19.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
18.10.2005 Lükata tagasi For
18.10.2005 Lükata tagasi For
18.10.2005 Lükata tagasi For
17.10.2005 Päevakorra kinnitamine For
13.10.2005 Lõpphääletus Absent
12.10.2005 Lükata tagasi Against
12.10.2005 29. parandus Against
12.10.2005 28. parandus Against
12.10.2005 27. parandus Against
12.10.2005 26. parandus Against
12.10.2005 25. parandus Against
12.10.2005 24. parandus Against
12.10.2005 23. parandus Against
12.10.2005 21. parandus Against
12.10.2005 20. parandus Against
12.10.2005 19. parandus Against
12.10.2005 18. parandus Against
12.10.2005 17. parandus Did not vote
12.10.2005 16. parandus Against
12.10.2005 15. parandus Against
12.10.2005 14. parandus Against
12.10.2005 13. parandus Against
12.10.2005 12. parandus Against
12.10.2005 11. parandus Against
12.10.2005 10. parandus Against
12.10.2005 9. parandus Against
12.10.2005 5. parandus Against
12.10.2005 4. parandus Against
12.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
12.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For
12.10.2005 Lõpphääletus For