Timeline
“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (469 − 387) / 469 = 17.5%
Registered 469 · Absent 0
· Votes available 469
For: 214 · Against: 173 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 44 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (3 − 3) / 3 = 0.0%
Registered 3 · Absent 0
· Votes available 3
For: 2 · Against: 1 ·
Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 0 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1948 − 1105) / 1948 = 43.3%
Registered 1948 · Absent 0
· Votes available 1948
For: 892 · Against: 213 ·
Abstain: 4 · Did not vote: 480 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2067 − 1383) / 2067 = 33.1%
Registered 2066 · Absent 1
· Votes available 2067
For: 1164 · Against: 219 ·
Abstain: 5 · Did not vote: 449 ·
Absent: 1
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
How is this calculated?
Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2514) / 4466 = 43.7%
Registered 4466 · Absent 0
· Votes available 4466
For: 1833 · Against: 681 ·
Abstain: 15 · Did not vote: 1153 ·
Absent: 0
Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.
Votes most like / Votes most unlike
Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).
Votes most like
- Siret Kotka 100% agreement
- Mart Helme 100% agreement
- Tarmo Tamm 100% agreement
- Enn Eesmaa 100% agreement
- Rene Kokk 100% agreement
- Helle-Moonika Helme 100% agreement
- Andres Metsoja 100% agreement
- Aivar Kokk 100% agreement
Votes most unlike
- Jevgeni Ossinovski 26% agreement
- Kalvi Kõva 32% agreement
- Heljo Pikhof 33% agreement
- Keit Pentus-Rosimannus 35% agreement
- Indrek Saar 35% agreement
- Lauri Läänemets 37% agreement
- Eerik-Niiles Kross 38% agreement
- Raimond Kaljulaid 38% agreement
Parties
| term | Parties |
|---|---|
| 14. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 13. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 12. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 11. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
| 9. term | Eesti Keskerakonna fraktsioon Centre Party |
Votes
| Date | Vote motion | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13.11.2002 | 9. parandus | Against |
| 13.11.2002 | 7. parandus | Against |
| 13.11.2002 | 6. parandus | Against |
| 13.11.2002 | 5. parandus | Against |
| 13.11.2002 | 3. parandus | For |
| 13.11.2002 | 2. parandus | For |
| 13.11.2002 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 13. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 12. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 11. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 10. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 9. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 8. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 7. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 5. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 4. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 12.11.2002 | Tiit Toomsalu ettepanek, tuua tänases päevakorras tema algatatud eelnõu 1155 päevakorra punktist nr | For |
| 12.11.2002 | Enn Tarto ja Mõõdukate fraktsiooni ettepanek, viia tänases päevakorras punkt 11, seaduseelnõu 1169, | For |
| 11.11.2002 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 11.11.2002 | Eelnõu päevakorrast välja | Against |
| 11.11.2002 | Tähtaja pikendamine 1024 SE | Absent |
| 11.11.2002 | Tähtaja pikendamine 1009 SE | Absent |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 06.11.2002 | Lugemist mitte lõpetada | Against |
| 06.11.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 05.11.2002 | Lugemise lõpetamine | For |
| 05.11.2002 | 6. parandus | For |
| 05.11.2002 | 3. parandus | Against |
| 05.11.2002 | 2. parandus | Against |
| 05.11.2002 | 1. parandus | Against |
| 04.11.2002 | Päevakorra kinnitamine | For |
| 04.11.2002 | Tähtaja pikendamine 1013SE | For |
| 04.11.2002 | Tähtaja pikendamine 907SE | For |
| 24.10.2002 | Tööaja pikendamine | For |
| 23.10.2002 | Lugemist mitte lõpetada | Against |
| 23.10.2002 | Lugemist mitte lõpetada | Against |
| 23.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 23.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 23.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 23.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 22.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | Did not vote |
| 22.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |
| 22.10.2002 | Lõpphääletus | For |