Reform Party

Maret Maripuu

Voting bloc: 60 vote alike · 12. term

Terms served

1426

Policy votes

21.2%

Inactivity %

100.0%

Attendance %

For · 36%Against · 35%Abstained · 29%

Timeline

“Inactivity” measures how often a deputy did not cast a For or Against vote on motions they could have voted on — whether absent, or present but not registering, abstaining, or not pressing. A non-vote is not neutral: a motion passes only with a majority of For votes, so being present yet not voting effectively withholds support — counting, in practice, the same as a vote against. Attendance shows how often a deputy at least registered for the sitting.

12. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

21.2%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 21.2

Present but silent % 21.2

Party loyalty % 99.9

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1426 − 1123) / 1426 = 21.2%

Registered 1426 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1426
For: 518 · Against: 605 · Abstain: 0 · Did not vote: 233 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

11. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

15.5%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 15.5

Present but silent % 15.5

Party loyalty % 99.7

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (1116 − 943) / 1116 = 15.5%

Registered 1116 · Absent 0 · Votes available 1116
For: 475 · Against: 468 · Abstain: 3 · Did not vote: 87 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

10. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

38.8%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 38.8

Present but silent % 38.8

Party loyalty % 99.2

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (2557 − 1565) / 2557 = 38.8%

Registered 2557 · Absent 0 · Votes available 2557
For: 816 · Against: 749 · Abstain: 2 · Did not vote: 421 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

9. term Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

50.0%

Inactivity %

Attendance % 100.0

Inactivity % 50.0

Present but silent % 50.0

Party loyalty % 99.3

How is this calculated?

Inactivity % = (Votes available − Voted (for/against)) / Votes available = (4466 − 2232) / 4466 = 50.0%

Registered 4466 · Absent 0 · Votes available 4466
For: 1152 · Against: 1080 · Abstain: 13 · Did not vote: 1595 · Absent: 0

Party loyalty % — Party loyalty is the share of a deputy's ballots cast with their faction's majority stance, over the policy votes they took part in.

Votes most like / Votes most unlike

Share of votes where both deputies cast the same For/Against ballot, over the motions both took part in (at least 50 in common).

Votes most like

Kaja Kallas 100% agreement
Taavi Rõivas 100% agreement
Indrek Raudne 100% agreement
Kalle Palling 100% agreement
Aivar Sõerd 100% agreement
Marko Mihkelson 100% agreement
Andrei Korobeinik 100% agreement
Urve Tiidus 100% agreement

Votes most unlike

Urbo Vaarmann 11% agreement
Mihhail Stalnuhhin 17% agreement
Mailis Reps 23% agreement
Jüri Morozov 24% agreement
Indrek Saar 27% agreement
Kadri Simson 30% agreement
Sven Mikser 30% agreement
Viktor Vassiljev 32% agreement

Parties

term	Parties
12. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
11. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
10. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party
9. term	Eesti Reformierakonna fraktsioon Reform Party

Votes

Date	Vote motion	Result
15.11.2001	276. parandus	For
15.11.2001	275. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	274. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	251. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	248. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	247. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	237. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	234. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	231. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	229. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	213. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	212. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	210. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	209. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	208. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	206. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	200. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	199. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	198. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	197. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	196. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	177. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	166. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	157. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	156. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	153. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	152. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	150. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	147. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	132. parandus	Did not vote
15.11.2001	131. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	130. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	129. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	127. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	126. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	125. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	124. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	123. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	122. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	121. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	116. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	114. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	112. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	111. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	110. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	109. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	108. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	107. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	104. parandus	Against
15.11.2001	92. parandus	Against